| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 322 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 317 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google, Yandex
|
| Latest Threads |
Resolution issue on Windo...
Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: pete
Yesterday, 01:38 AM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 13,998
|
- Add a "Quality of Life"...
Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: crasadure
04-24-2026, 03:57 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 149
|
Problem with Vantoy and a...
Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: capitainealbator
04-24-2026, 07:51 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 310
|
problems installing windo...
Forum: iVentoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: roy
04-23-2026, 12:36 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 817
|
Ventoy enroll key manager...
Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: MBSTech
04-22-2026, 03:23 PM
» Replies: 33
» Views: 100,921
|
iVentoy 1.0.27 release
Forum: iVentoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: longpanda
04-21-2026, 12:33 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 196
|
iVentoy stuck on new firm...
Forum: iVentoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: roy
04-20-2026, 02:46 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 477
|
Ventoy Tuxedo OS with per...
Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: Bear
04-20-2026, 07:55 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 169
|
华为RH2288H V2服务器上无法启动
Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: hxpro
04-15-2026, 08:21 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 308
|
iVentoy 1.0.26 release
Forum: iVentoy Discussion Forum
Last Post: longpanda
04-12-2026, 01:12 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 369
|
|
|
| Ventoy 1.0.46 버그 |
|
Posted by: hyun9358 - 06-14-2021, 12:44 AM - Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
- Replies (5)
|
 |
1.0.46 version bug
Hidden Shortcuts
F1/Ctrl+IWRU
After applying the theme
Shortcut keys on first boot
"s?" is expressed.
If I use the hotkey again after switching to another mode in this state, it works fine.
|
|
|
| "auto_install" |
|
Posted by: hyun9358 - 06-12-2021, 08:03 AM - Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
- Replies (14)
|
 |
{
"auto_install": [
{
"image": "/sources/Windows_Install/Windows10 Pro x64 20H2(19042.782) GSCD 2in1.iso",
"template": "/ventoy/script/Windows10_unattended-Mow-in.xml"
},
{
"image": "/sources/Windows_Install/Windows10 Pro x64 20H2(19042.804) Lite Util.iso",
"template": [
"/ventoy/script/Windows10_unattended1.xml",
"/ventoy/script/Windows10_unattended2.xml",
"/ventoy/script/Windows10_unattended3.xml",
"/ventoy/script/Windows10_unattended4.xml"
],
"autosel": 2
},
"auto_install"
It doesn't seem to work.
I've reported a sample, but it doesn't work.
How do I get it to work?
|
|
|
| First Ventoy Boot |
|
Posted by: perico - 06-09-2021, 02:13 PM - Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
- Replies (4)
|
 |
I can't get the "error" on my first USB boot with Ventoy. My system is a Lenovo L580 with OS Windows 10 Pro Ver. 21H1 Comp. 19043.985. With UEFI Bios. Just start Windows 10.Iso installed on USB. I cannot access the USB priority boot option without disabling Secure Boot.
Does this mean that it is necessary to keep Secure Boot disabled in order to use Ventoy?
|
|
|
| MX-Linux Persistance Only AFTER Boot ? |
|
Posted by: PaulJayD - 06-07-2021, 11:48 AM - Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
- Replies (8)
|
 |
I asked the following on the MX-Linux forum:
I can now successfully create a bootable Ventoy customized MX-Linux iso.
However, when I add the Ventoy "backend" persistence configuration, it
boots into an UN-customized instance!
Is there some option to boot skipping the persistence (until shutdown,
that is) ??
Thanks..
MX-Linux user 'fehlix' replied...
Justed booted up a couple of month older ventoy stick. ISTM, they
somehow have "hardcoded" the persistence option, without a way for the
user to choose whether persistence to use or not, when choosing ventoy's
persistence "backend". So I tend to agree with JayM that's rather a
ventoy issue, b/c they tweaked internal MX LiveUSB options, which was
always meant to allow the user to choose. In the way they done it (as I
see it), you can use the ventoy persistence "backend" but have not an
option to finetune. That might also be the reason why you see the
"vanilla" Live System without your data, b/c the missed to offer to the
user to copy over the saved persistence data (under/home) from the
compressed linuxfs file into the new persistence file.
Does this make sense?
Is there any way around this?
Thanks.
PaulJayD
|
|
|
|