Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Forum Statistics |
» Members: 11,202
» Latest member: davidw
» Forum threads: 1,501
» Forum posts: 6,170
Full Statistics
|
Online Users |
There are currently 181 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 177 Guest(s) Bing, Google, Yandex
|
|
|
Linux vDisk Plugin: Manjaro screen turns yellow |
Posted by: trymeout - 03-28-2022, 01:12 AM - Forum: Ventoy Plugin Forum
- Replies (2)
|
|
I installed Manjaro as a vDisk on my Ventoy drive and was able to boot it up and all was working well, I created a few new files and installed a few new apps. I then restarted Manjaro and ever since them the entire screen has a strong tint of yellow. So strong I can barely see the screen and had trouble shutting it down, logging in, using the distro.
I tried rebooting into Manjaro again and I still get this yellow screen. Has anyone else had this issue?
|
|
|
screen resolution and mouse support different via ventoy |
Posted by: perfection - 03-19-2022, 07:30 PM - Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
- Replies (2)
|
|
I hope i am able to express this adequately to you folks
When i boot an iso (say free Macrium bootable iso) i get a very ugly resolution which hides several tabs and functions and often does not let me access tabs such as 'ok' to complete an operation. Also i do not get mouse support (i need to attach an external mouse when running most ventoy compatible isos). Ventoy's screen resolution option does not solve my proble3m at all.
HOWEVER, when i use Rufus to make the same iso bootable, i get a brilliant display at high resolution of the bootable software with everything visible and accessible (not needing me to push and pull screens to get to some tabs) and i also have mouse support (on the trackpad)
Why does this huge difference in executing the two iso's occur? what exactly is happening?
Thanks
|
|
|
Ventoy 1.0.7 and file system exFat errors |
Posted by: kosh2323 - 03-15-2022, 06:38 AM - Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
- No Replies
|
|
I checked several ISO LinuxMint images, when I exit Live mode, it is suggested to take out the flash drive and press Enter, and I do so, then I load into Windows 10 x64, insert the same flash drive, and a window appears with a notification that the flash drive is damaged and errors need to be fixed, I fix it, and this notification no longer appears. But why does it appear at all? After downloading these ISO images, this notification appears:
linuxmint-20.3-cinnamon-64bit.iso
linuxmint-20.2-cinnamon-64bit.iso
linuxmint-20.1-cinnamon-64bit.iso
linuxmint-20-cinnamon-64bit.iso
linuxmint-20.3-mate-64bit.iso
After downloading these ISO images, the notification does not appear and there are no errors on the flash drive:
linuxmint-20.3-xfce-64bit.iso
linuxmint-19.3-cinnamon-64bit.iso
Starting with version 20 of Cinnamon, flash drive errors occur.
Moreover, if you write linuxmint-20.3-cinnamon-64bit.iso, it through Rufus 3.17, then there are no errors.
All ISO images are checked with a checksum on the official website, and were downloaded from there. In addition, there are other ISO images on the flash drive, these are utilities and others. All are loaded without problems. When pulling out and inserting the flash drive later into the working system, no errors occur.
After long checks, changing flash drives, ports, that's what we managed to find out. If you boot from a flash drive with Ventoy, and specify the ISO image as the ISO image that is on the HDD (I'm trying on this linuxmint-20.3-cinnamon-64bit.iso ), then there are no errors, but if the ISO image is selected from another connected flash drive, then errors occur on the flash drive where it is located. As a result, there is a suspicion that errors occur due to the file system of the exFAT flash drive (I tried to reformat it with Windows tools, it did not give results). Then I decided to try the same operations with NTFS, Fat32 file systems with the same ISO image. As a result, there were no errors when reconnecting the flash drive.
There is an assumption that the exFAT file system is not the best choice. Is it possible to add an option in which the user himself will choose which file system the partition will be formatted to accommodate ISO images?
|
|
|
Why are all uefi botable isos not supported out of the box |
Posted by: perfection - 03-14-2022, 05:19 AM - Forum: Ventoy Discussion Forum
- Replies (6)
|
|
There is something i have never understood about using isos with ventoy
What exactly interferes with ventoy supporting all UEFI bootable isos out of the box?
Why some and not others?
For example, Minitools data recovery 9.2 works perfectly with ventoy uefi boot while 10.2 fails to....
and what tweaking is involved in making these isos compatible and who does it?
can be do it ourselves and is there a guide to it?
I am not the ultimate techie but am a great fan of Ventoy from its inception
|
|
|
|